What to Do on Climate?
George M. Woodwell
Bill
McKibben and his 350 organization are correct……and as close to effective as
anyone can be in pushing a distracted administration to constructive
action.
But what
action?
What can we
tell the administration to do right now after rejecting the Keystone Pipeline
and withdrawing all support for the disastrous Canadian tar sands project?
The answer
is straightforward, well defined, and already ratified by the Congress of the US and by the rest of the world. We must implement the agreement reached in
1992 when we and all other nations signed the Framework Convention on Climate
Change. All agreed to stabilize the composition
of the atmospheric burden of heat-trapping gases at levels that would
protect human interests and nature.
While we have passed that level, the objective remains and stabilization
remains the first step in correcting a disastrous trend.
We, the US,
can take large further steps in reducing emissions, celebrate the steps already
taken that are effective, and announce an aggressive series of policies in
moving rapidly toward other steps. The steps must include reduction in methane as
well as carbon dioxide emissions, but they require no further action by the
Congress which has made the Convention the law of the land.
The moment
is now and the initiative is in the hands of our presidential leadership.
Let’s
remind him that he’s in charge and the stakes are very high.
Woods
Hole, June 7, 2013
Any thoughts on the latest news: Global Climate Negotiations Break Down in Bonn. Go Figure. Tom Zeller, The Huffington Post 6/12/2013. Zeller reports many positive efforts, though small, by China, Australia and USA - all in vain because Russia and company are miffed.
ReplyDeleteI gather Africa will suffer most.